Cultural Law Self Rule

EoP Axis Domestic Policy to Provide Responsible Freedom groups of citizens with subjective racial, religious or gender cultural values with Cultural Law Self Rule; shall be legally nationally and internationally implemented, once Intn’l Court of Justice has ruled on legal certainty of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles, and confirmed Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law, as international law. Citizens and Landowners who wish to volutarily begin to implement cooperative property ration process to deindustrialize to cultural law self rule communities low tech agrarian sustainable future may follow suggestions as suggested in EoP Truth and Reconciliation Draft StatementsCitizens who wish to support their military, racial, political, religious, business etc leaders to begin EoP Truth and Reconciliation Legal Certainty Enquiry official public negotiations in their Nation, can show their support by signing their Responsible Freedom Oaths.

.

Cultural Law:

Cultural law refers to any racial, religious, gender cultural value agreed upon, and codified in a written agreement between two or more individuals, which does not violate any of the scientific laws; enabling a greater degree of cooperation and mutual assistance support between such individuals.

Individuals Rights and Duties under Cultural Law include: Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities.

Violations of Cultural Law would fall under Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.

Conflict of Cultural Law Violations: Violations of Cultural Law between two individuals or groups of individuals with different Cultural Laws, would be adjudicated in terms of Scientific Law: Crimes of Aggression: Violations of Fully Informed Consent.

Scientific and Cultural Law.

.

EoP Axis: US, RU, CN & NATO Domestic Policy:

[..]

Cultural Law Territorial Self Rule for Groups with Subjective Racial, Religious& Gender Culture-Conflict Identities:

Individuals and/or groups of individuals who are willing to cooperate, and whose sharing of particular socio-cultural values enable them to engage in a higher level of cooperation; should be provided any assistance to enable such greater cooperation.

Individuals or racial, religious or gender based groups of individuals who have signed their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Oaths should not be coerced into residential territorial integration with groups of individuals who have conflicting racial, religious or gender based subjective socio-cultural values.

Individuals or racial, religious or gender based groups of individuals who abide by  their Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Oaths, in terms of procreation, consumption and fully informed consenting agreements, can  peacefully coexist as neighbouring tribes or communities; who have conflicting subjective racial, religious or gender based cultural values; but keep their particular subjective racial, religious or gender based cultural value rules within the confines of their group’s territory.

Consequently the State shall grant any – ideological, racial, religious, gender group of secessionist minded individuals – limited secessionist tribal ‘subjective cultural fully informed consent rulemaking’ self determination restriction of immigration into their territory, from any other group that does share some of their tribes fully informed consenting subjective socio-racial or religious cultural values; in exchange for such tribe abiding by honourable and orderly deindustrialization and depopulation by enforcing procreation, consumption and fully informed consenting agreements amongst the members of their racial or religious tribe.

Put differently if a group of individuals abide by their breeding, consumption and fully informed consenting relating agreements EoP social contract values; and conduct their fully informed consenting agreement relating activities — such as for example cannibalism, white or black power walking penis goose-stepping to impress girls; sharia law, etc — that other groups may find offensive; within the confines of their clearly delineated fully informed consenting agreed upon ‘Cultural Law Self Rule’ residential community; such relating activity shall be considered lawful; and cannot be legally restricted or punished by a different group of individuals who have different subjective racial, religious or gender behavioural preferences or values..

Scientific and Cultural Law; EoP Axis Domestic & Foreign Policy.

.