Legal Certainty Enquiry

Summary of EoP Applicants suggested Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Legal Certainty Enquiry Negotiations to (i) one or more Nation’s Constitutional Court/s, and subsequently to all UN General Assembly Nations at the International Court of Justice; to (a) confirm Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law, as international law. Citizens who wish to support their military, racial, political, religious, business etc leaders to begin EoP Truth and Reconciliation Legal Certainty Enquiry official public negotiations in their Nation, can show their support by signing their Responsible Freedom Oaths.

.

EoP Axis: US, RU, CN & NATO Domestic Policy:

EoP Legal Certainty Enquiry Domestic Policy:

EoP Axis Presidents will instruct the Secretary of State; Secretary of Defence and Attorney General collectively to cooperate with regards to:

Political Party Licensing:

[1] Suspend Elections and licensing of Political Parties; pending confirmation from International Court of Justice; of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles.

[2] Pending such ICJ confirmation: EoP Political Party licensing and registration shall require all political party members of such EoP Political Party to have signed a Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration Oath; in order to be a member of a political party; and/or to be nominated by such party to stand for local, state or federal election.

EoP v WiP Domestic Informal and Legal ‘EoP Legal Certainty’ Negotiations:

Attorney General is to file an application with the Constitutional Court to confirm the legal certainty accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles.

Any individual or group of citizen/s or organization/s who objects to the Constitutional Court’s legal certainty confirmation of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; may submit their subjective and/or objective evidence to the court; for the courts inter-cultural consideration thereof.

If the National Supreme or Constitutional Court confirms the legal certainty of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; such confirmation is submitted to the International Court of Justice for its consideration and court records.

If the National Supreme or Constitutional Court does not confirm the legal certainty of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; their evidentiary written reasons are submitted to the International Court of Justice for its consideration and court records.

If the National Supreme or Constitutional Court and International Court of Justice confirm the legal certainty of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; such ruling is used as the legal certainty foundation to amend all International Treaties and International law statutes; to be in accordance with Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles.

If the National Supreme or Constitutional Court and International Court of Justice do not confirm the legal certainty of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; the EoP NTE GMA President, Cabinet shall apologize in writing to the nation for their sincere; but incorrect working hypothesis conclusion as to the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles.

EoP RH Factual Reality Legal Certainty Domestic Policy.

.

EoP Axis: US, RU, CN & NATO Foreign Policy:

EoP Legal Certainty Enquiry Foreign Policy:

EoP Axis Presidents will instruct the Secretary of State; Secretary of Defence and Attorney General collectively to cooperate with regards to:

EoP v WiP Legal ‘EoP Legal Certainty’ Foreign Policy Enquiry Negotiations:

EoP Axis Attorney Generals are to file an application with the International Court of Justice; to enquire whether any UN General Assembly Nation legally objects to the International Court of Justice confirmation of legal certainty of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles.

Any UN General Assembly Nation who objects to the prior ICJ ruling of legal certainty confirmation of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; may submit their subjective and/or objective objection evidence to the ICJ, for the courts inter-cultural consideration thereof.

If the ICJ considers any evidence submitted to it to expose any factual reality error in the Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; or alternatively provides an edited version of the principles that make for better plain language reading; to include such evidence and make the suggested amended recommendations to the EoP RH Factual reality principles or language; and/or if such sufficient contrarian evidence is provided to change its mind; and withdraw its former legal certainty ruling.

If the ICJ withdraws it prior legal certainty ruling; all EoP Axis Presidents and their cabinets of all EoP Axis nations; shall resign and apologize in writing to the UN General Assembly,  for their sincere; but incorrect working hypothesis conclusion as to the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality principles.

If the ICJ confirms the legal certainty of the accuracy of Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Principles; such confirmation is confirmed as the legal certainty mandate for military, legal, political and economic international and national implementation of Ecology of Peace Factual Reality international law social contract.

EoP RH Factual Reality Legal Certainty Foreign Policy.

.