Responsible Freedom

Citizens who wish to support their military, racial, political, religious, business etc leaders to begin EoP Truth and Reconciliation Legal Certainty Enquiry official public negotiations in their Nation, can show their support by signing their Responsible Freedom Oaths. Responsible Freedom citizens may be used as a mandate for a Nation’s leaders to embark on EoP Applicants suggested Ecology of Peace Radical Honoursty Factual Reality Legal Certainty Enquiry Negotiations to (i) one or more Nation’s Constitutional Court/s, and subsequently to all UN General Assembly Nations at the International Court of Justice; to (a) confirm Ecology of Peace scientific and cultural law, as international law.

.

EoP MILED Clerk EoP v WiP NWO Negotiations, on behalf of EoP Applicants, to setup an Ecology of Peace Responsible Peacenik Freedom Database, for individuals who have signed their Responsible Freedom Oaths; is available at: EoP TRC Draft Statements.

Temporarily, pending aforementioned Responsible Peacenik Freedom Database logistics discussions as to whom shall help to setup and manage such RPF database, signed Responsible Freedom Oaths, may be submitted to the EoP MILED Clerk, and shall be documented at  EoP Axis Oath.

02 Aug 2017 Responsible Freedom Oath Draft Template [PDF] for individuals ready to sign their responsible freedom oath.

.

Prior to Implementation of EoP International Law:

 

Prior to the International Court of Justice EoP Legal Certainty [eop-legcertenq.tygae.org.za] confirmation of EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za]; international law social contract that shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalize all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future; EoP Scientific and Cultural National and International Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] Oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za]; shall state as follows:.

Responsible Freedom Oath/Declaration.

A citizen’s signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration will declare – until, if or when updated for greater clarity – that the particular citizen understands and legally agrees to the following:

Eco Literacy:

I hereby declare that I understand Responsible Freedom to mean:

[1] Earth is not flat.
[2] Resources are finite.
[3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
[4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
[5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
[6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely – aka ego-literacy [ego-eco-literacy.tygae.org.za] – want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate [eop-cooperator.tygae.org.za] to nullify the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses and replace them with Ecology of Peace clauses that restricts all the worlds citizens to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
[7] I hereby request – and commit to support – the President and all supporting Political Party leaders, Executive, Legislative and/or Judicial State officials; to officially and publicly begin political and/or legal International negotiations; to implement [eop-nwo-sco.tygae.org.za] an Ecology of Peace international law social contract [eop-nwo-scf.tygae.org.za]; that shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalize all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future.

.

Ego Literacy

Fully Informed Consenting Agreements via Ego Literacy communication values:

I hereby declare that I understand Honourable Reason & Logic Problem Solving Communication Policy Discourse values to mean:

[8] If I am committed to honourable discourse; and I am giving someone else the benefit of the doubt that they are committed to honourable truthseeking discussion:
[8.1] I clarify my preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what I want; and whether they are willing to engage me in entering into an agreement; to help me get what I want; and reciprocally whether I can help them to get what they may want.
[8.2] I always respond to verbal and written correspondence, with a sincere honest response. If I don’t have time to respond; I inform them by when they can expect a response.
[8.3] I sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology – i.e. right wing to left wing – religion, race or culture. Active listening means that I verify that my interpretation of their statements is accurate; before concluding that I have ‘heard their argument’.
[8.4] I focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts. If or where I include reference to abstract concepts; I am willing to define my meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance. [Info re: Abstract, General, Concrete or Specific Terms; archive.is/OJyMM]
[8.5] I evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.
[8.6] If I am not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; I am willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and cooperate if they are willing to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better quality evidence; so that a stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.
[8.7] I remain in the conversation until we find agreement; so as to support each other on other issues that we do agree upon, which are based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.
[8.8] If or where sincere conflict arises in the discussion about the issue in dispute; I am committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing myself, them or both of us to get over our anger; as opposed to requiring them to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons.
[8.9] Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed. If either of us decide that we are unable to resolve the conflict between us:
[8.9.a] If none of us are employed by the State and/or legally obligated to help each other on the particular issue of preference in dispute; we honourably terminate discussions and approach others for help to get what we respectively want.
[8.9.b] If one or both of us are employed by the State and/or an organization or profession legally obligated to provide support to enable resolution of the particular requested preference; we cooperatively refer the matter to an honourable discourse truthseeking arbitrator for impartial dispute resolution.
[8.10]  If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of my evidence for any of my ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; I love reason and logic more than my ego-identity and hence I am willing to publicly change my mind, on that particular subject and amend my ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.

Ego Literacy Honourable Discourse are excerpted from: EoP ADR [eop-adr.tygae.org.za]: EoP RH culture info [eop-rh-cult-info.tygae.org.za]; which provides more information on how to deal with individuals who are not interested in honourable truthseeking discourse.

Naturally anyone who refuses – without reasonable justification – to engage in aforementioned honourable discourse; is not remotely interested in peace, anti-war, or non-violent root cause problem solving of socio-economic resource war conflict; and depending on the circumstances; may consciously or unconsciously be providing their informed consent justification for the issue in dispute to be resolved by means of violence. Although honourable discourse would recommend that they be consciously made aware of how their refusal to engage in honourable discourse root cause problem solving of the issue in dispute; demonstrates their lack of commitment and sincerity to non-violent root cause problem solving.

~~~~~~~~~~~~**~~~~~~~~~~~~

Subsequent to Implementation of EoP International Law:

Subsequent to the International Court of Justice EoP Legal Certainty [eop-legcertenq.tygae.org.za] confirmation of EoP RH FR [eop-rh-fr.tygae.org.za] EoP Scientific and Cultural Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za];  such Ecology of Peace international law social contract shall (a) require all citizens of all races, religions, nations, to breed and consume below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za]; (b) nationalize all property [eop-sdwipecon.tygae.org.za] and provide all responsible freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za] citizens a property ration [property-ration.tygae.org.za] to enable their shelter and survival self-sufficiency to enable the rebuilding of a relocalized low-tech organic agrarian sustainable future; EoP Scientific and Cultural National and International Law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] Responsible Freedom [responsible-freedom.tygae.org.za] Oath [eop-axis-oath.tygae.org.za]; shall state as follows:

Responsible Freedom Oath.

A citizen’s signed Ecology of Peace Fully Informed Consenting Agreement Responsible Freedom Declaration will declare – until, if or when updated for greater clarity – that the particular citizen understands and legally agrees to the following:

Eco Literacy

I hereby declare that I understand Responsible Freedom Eco Literacy to mean:

[1] Earth is not flat.
[2] Resources are finite.
[3] When humans breed or consume above ecological carrying capacity limits, it results in ecological overshoot, resource depletion and resource conflict.
[4] Some of the socio-cultural and psycho-political consequences of overpopulation & consumption collision with declining resources include: poverty, slavery, unemployment, food shortages, food inflation, cost of living increases, urban sprawl, traffic jams, toxic waste, pollution, peak oil, peak water, peak food, peak population, species extinction, loss of biodiversity, peak resources, racial, religious, class, gender resource war conflict, militarized police, psycho-social and cultural conformity pressures on free speech, etc; inter-cultural conflict; legal, political and corporate corruption, etc.
[5] The root cause of humans breeding and consuming above ecological carrying capacity limits is the ‘right to breed and consume with total disregard for ecological carrying capacity limits’ clauses of the Masonic War is Peace international law social contract.
[6] If individuals, families, tribes, races, religions, political parties, corporations and/or nations sincerely want to (a) sustainably protect natural resources for future generations; and/or (b) reduce class, racial and/or religious local, national and international resource war conflict; and/or (c) enable honourable, transparent and humane international cooperative de-industrialization and depopulation of the planet to return to living in accordance to ecological carrying capacity limits; they should (d) cooperate to uphold EoP scientific and cultural national and international law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za]; that requires all citizens of all races, religions and nations to procreate below ecological carrying capacity limits; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool.
[7] I hereby commit to cooperate to uphold EoP scientific and cultural national and international law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za]; that requires all citizens of all races, religions and nations to procreate below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; or be humanely eliminated from the planetary genepool; by (a) holding myself responsible to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits [eop-footprint.tygae.org.za]; and relating to others in accordance to fully informed consenting agreements; (b) cooperating by holding my fellow citizens responsible to procreating and consuming below ecological carrying capacity limits; and relating to others in accordance to fully informed consenting agreements; by providing any crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za] violator with my ego-literate honourable constructive criticism as to their possible crimes of aggression violation, for resolution in accordance to Egological Literacy communication values; and (c) cooperating with EoP scientific and cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] international law officials, to enforce EoP scientific and cultural law [eop-scicultlaw.tygae.org.za] crimes of aggression [crimes-of-aggression.tygae.org.za] investigative and juridical enquiry and/or scarcity combatant violation sentences, in another nation; if or when so requested by intnl law officials, when (i) such nations officials request EoP scientific and cultural law enforcement help from another nation or the International Court; or (b) other nations observe and notify the International Court of a particular nations lack of EoP scientific and cultural law enforcement.

Ego Literacy:

Fully Informed Consenting Agreements via Ego Literacy communication values:

I hereby declare that I understand Honourable Reason & Logic Problem Solving Communication Policy Discourse values to mean:

[8] If I am committed to honourable discourse; and I am giving someone else the benefit of the doubt that they are committed to honourable truthseeking discussion:
[8.1] I clarify my preferences; to enable people being communicated to, to clearly know what I want; and whether they are willing to engage me in entering into an agreement; to help me get what I want; and reciprocally whether I can help them to get what they may want.
[8.2] I always respond to verbal and written correspondence, with a sincere honest response. If I don’t have time to respond; I inform them by when they can expect a response.
[8.3] I sincerely and actively listen to the evidence from any individual, irrespective of their political ideology – i.e. right wing to left wing – religion, race or culture. Active listening means that I verify that my interpretation of their statements is accurate; before concluding that I have ‘heard their argument’.
[8.4] I focus on simplifying the issue discussed, using as much as possible descriptive words; as opposed to abstract concepts. If or where I include reference to abstract concepts; I am willing to define my meaning of that abstract concept within that circumstance. [Info re: Abstract, General, Concrete or Specific Terms; archive.is/OJyMM]
[8.5] I evaluate their argument based upon the evidence they present, not their race, religion or political ideology; etc.
[8.6] If I am not convinced by the quality of their evidence on any particular issue; I am willing to agree to disagree on that particular issue, and cooperate if they are willing to engage in cooperative truthseeking to get better quality evidence; so that a stronger beyond reasonable doubt conclusion can be drawn on the particular issue in dispute.
[8.7] I remain in the conversation until we find agreement; so as to support each other on other issues that we do agree upon, which are based upon more conclusive buck stops here evidence.
[8.8] If or where sincere conflict arises in the discussion about the issue in dispute; I am committed to remaining in the conversation and finding a way to resolve the conflict, by allowing myself, them or both of us to get over our anger; as opposed to requiring them to suppress their anger for political correct ‘lets pretend we are getting along’ reasons.
[8.9] Once the emotional steam has been released through the conflict resolution process; both parties will find themselves in a more calm neutral space where the truthseeking conversation can proceed. If either of us decide that we are unable to resolve the conflict between us:
[8.9.a] If none of us are employed by the State and/or legally obligated to help each other on the particular issue of preference in dispute; we honourably terminate discussions and approach others for help to get what we respectively want.
[8.9.b] If one or both of us are employed by the State and/or an organization or profession legally obligated to provide support to enable resolution of the particular requested preference; we cooperatively refer the matter to an honourable discourse truthseeking arbitrator for impartial dispute resolution.
[8.10]  If at any point during discussion; or arbitration proceedings; their evidence proves any of my evidence for any of my ideological, racial or religious working hypothesis theories or beliefs to be inaccurate; I love reason and logic more than my ego-identity and hence I am willing to publicly change my mind, on that particular subject and amend my ideological working hypothesis or belief with the new evidence provided; and if necessary to apologize.

.

Last Updated: 02 Aug  2017

.